Justice Vyas rejected the bail application by characterizing the proceedings as but an initiation and highlighting the inaction of the Station Officer.
Bail application dismissed; proceedings treated as an initiation; Investigating Officer held accountable for inaction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14955/2021
Rajendra S/o Shri Nandkishore, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Mandpur Ps Seeswali Dist. Baran Raj. (At Present Confined In Baran Jail)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
24/11/2021
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&lhlokyh ftyk&ckajk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&104 @21 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 302 rFkk 34 Hkk-na-la- esa is’k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ] /kkjk 161 ,oa 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds v/khu ys[kc) dFkuksa esa ugha gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls dksbZ cjkenxh Hkh ugha gqbZ gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ ls dksbZ izdj.k iathc) ugha gSA erd dh yk'k iapukek ,oa iksLVekVZe fjiksVZ esa erd ds 'kjhj ij fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ pksVsa ugha ik;h x;h gSaA izdj.k esa vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA lg&vfHk;qDr jktkjke dh tekur
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-14955/2021]
bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
tcfd fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k vkSj rdZ fn;k fd lg&vfHk;qDr jktkjke dh f'kuk[rh dk;Zokgh esa xokg }kjk mls lgh :i ls ifgpkuk ugha x;k] blfy, mldh tekur gqbZ tcfd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktsUnz dks xokg us f'kuk[rh dk;Zokgh esa lgh igpku fd;k FkkA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 302 Hkk-na-la- dk xaHkhj vkjksi gSA erd dh QksVks ds vk/kkj ij crk;k gS fd erd ds 'kjhj ij pksVsa ik;h x;hA blfy, tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
eSaus mi;qZDr ijLij fojks/kh rdksZa ij fopkj fd;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktsUnz iq= uUnfd'kksj dh f'kuk[rh dk;Zokgh ¼i"B la[;k 59 ls 61½ i=koyh ij miyC/k gS] ftlds voyksdu ls izFken"V;k ;g izdV gksrk gS fd xokg jkts'k mQZ jktk d';i us vfHk;qDr jktsUnz dks lgh igpku fd;k gSA vr% izLrqr rdks a Z] izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksiksa dh xaHkhjrk vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, bl izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij foospu fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
Mittal /11
mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la- 1 fnukad 2tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk fgUnh esa [kqys U;k;ky; esa fy[kk;k x;kA
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in the present context given the investigating authority's competence and the petitioner's lack of prior records.
Whether the Investigating Officer (PS Police Station) of a PS subdivision has the jurisdiction to hold the accused.
Whether the Investigating Officer should have informed the Headquarters regarding the case.
Rajendra
State of Rajasthan
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
