Allowed

Jitendra @ Jitu Meghwal S/O Shri Bhomaram Meghwal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Sept 2021CRLMB/14058/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail applications filed by Suresh Dhankad and Jitendra Meghwal who were arrested under Sections 379 and 483 IPC. The court ordered their enlargement on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of petitioners on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Jitendra @ Jitu Meghwal S/O Shri Bhomaram Meghwal Vs State… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14054/2021

¶3

Suresh Dhankad S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Meghwal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Singara Ps Rupangarh Dist. Ajmer (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14058/2021

¶10

Jitendra @ Jitu Meghwal S/o Shri Bhomaram Meghwal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kaletada Ps Peelwa Dist. Nagaur Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶17

Order

¶18

01/09/2021

¶19

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.253/2021 Registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 379 and 483 IPC.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners are

¶21

(2 of 2)

¶22

[CRLMB-14054/2021]

¶23

behind the bars since long and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications.

¶25

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶26

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Suresh Dhankad S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Meghwal and Jitendra @ Jitu Meghwal S/o Shri Bhomaram Meghwal shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶27

A copy of this order be placed in another connected file.

¶28

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶29

Gourav/271-272

Jitendra @ Jitu Meghwal S/O Shri Bhomaram Meghwal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra @ Jitu Meghwal S/O Shri Bhomaram Meghwal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aashik Ali S/O Shri Chhotu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Heeralal S/O Hanuman Vs State of Rajasthan

Chatrapal S/O Horam Vs State of Rajasthan

Amjad S/O Ahmed Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Kumar S/O Lahari Vs State of Rajasthan

Prem Singh S/O Shri Mohar Singh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan