Allowed

Antoni Varki S/O Sh. M.M. Varki (Madmana Mathai Varki) v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Nov 2021CRLMB/13200/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to Antoni Varki in a case involving Sections 406, 420, and 120-B IPC. The court deemed it just and proper to enlarge him on bail without expressing an opinion on merits, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail provision of a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Antoni Varki S/O Sh. M.M. Varki (Madmana Mathai Varki) Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13200/2021

¶3

Antoni Varki S/o Sh. M.M. Varki (Madmana Mathai Varki), Aged About 54 Years, R/o Mandana House Cmc-30 Cherthala Dist. Alleppi Keral And Cc72/1639 Madvana House Ashoka Road Cherupushpam Lane Kaloor Dist. Arnakulam (Keral) At Present 72/2342 A-4 Desi Classic Aariya Padamlen Apra 66 Achyutham Lay Out Kaloor Dist. Arnakulam Keral At Present Tenant 1/305 Sk Complex Pediyarman Nagar Tirupur (Tamilnadu) At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP Mr. Man Singh Meena, Adv.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

23/11/2021

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.333/2020 Registered at Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 28.07.2021. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Offence against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-13200/2021]

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Antoni Varki S/o Sh. M.M. Varki (Madmana Mathai Varki) shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Jatin/16

Antoni Varki S/O Sh. M.M. Varki (Madmana Mathai Varki) v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Antoni Varki S/O Sh. M.M. Varki (Madmana Mathai Varki) v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Jatav S/O Bhagyamal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sandeep Bairwa S/O Shri Prithviraj Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Ramniwas Vs State of Rajasthan

Yogendra Mehta @ Tapaswi Baba S/O Late Shri Moharilal Mheta Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam Husain S/O Ahsan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Jasvindra Singh S/O Jarnel Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan