Allowed

Mubarik S/O Aamin @ Robda v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Aug 2021CRLMB/12628/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Singh Dhaddha allowed the bail application filed by two accused petitioners implicating them in offences under Section 379 IPC. The court deemed it just and proper to grant bail without expressing opinion on merits, subject to the furnishing of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of petitioners on bail conditioned upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Mubarik S/O Aamin @ Robda Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12628/2021

¶3

Mubarik S/o Aamin @ Robda, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Gram Kaimasa Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶4

Premchand @ Damu S/o Ratan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gram Kaimasa Ps Govindgarh Dist. Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

24/08/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.212/2021 registered at Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 379 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been wrongly implicated in this case. They are behind the bars since 1.7.2021. Offence against the petitioners is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioners be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-12628/2021]

¶19

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (1) Mubarik S/o Aamin @ Robda and (2) Premchand @ Damu S/o Ratan shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶22

Brijesh 84.

Mubarik S/O Aamin @ Robda v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mubarik S/O Aamin @ Robda v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naval Kishore Gautam S/O Late Shri Giriraj Gautam Vs State of Rajasthan

Munshhi Ram Son of Adisal Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemlata Choudhary W/O Shri Ishwar Choudhary B/C Sindhi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajeet Singh S/O Niranjan Singh Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Rajendra @ Rajkumar S/O Shri Shivnath, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohitash S/O Phool Singh Vs State of Rajasthan