Geeta Devi v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was not pressed by the petitioner at the hearing. The court dismissed the application but granted liberty to file a fresh application if occasion arose.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file a fresh anticipatory bail application if occasion arises.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S. B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12310/2021
Geeta Devi W/o Hardevaram, aged about 66 years, R/o Khedi Khinwsi, P.S. Peelwa, Tehsil Parbatsar, District Nagaur
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Umesh Shr |
imali |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bishno |
i, P.P. |
| Mrs. Manju | Choudhary for the | |
| complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
Order
20/09/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail when the applicant seeks only liberty to file a fresh application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Geeta Devi W/o Hardevaram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Rameshwar Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/12310/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court