On bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court allowed bail to the petitioner accused of offences under Sections 365, 395 and 342 IPC, noting lack of TIDP connection and that co-accused were on bail.
Released on bail with personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12228/2020
Akka @ Akeel @ Jadeja Son Of Shri Pappu @ Deen Mohammed Mev, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Chorgadhi, Police Station, Khoh, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Jail At Kotputli, District Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta present in the Court For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deshraj Gosingha, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
28/01/2021
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-12228/2020]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
ARTI SHARMA /7
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused despite criminal antecedents.
Whether the charge-sheet adequately connected the petitioner to the crime in the absence of a test identification parade.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Akka @ Akeel @ Jadeja
State Of Rajasthan
PANKAJ BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
