Allowed

Voraram v. State

Rajasthan HC18 Oct 2021CRLMB/12213/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. allowed for two accused persons arrested in an FIR for offences including AAPC Section 341, 323, 34, and 392 IPC. Court deemed it just and proper to release them on bail pending trial. Each accused to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be enlarged on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the trial Judge.

Voraram Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12213/2021

¶3

Voraram S/o Rataram, Aged About 20 Years, B/c Devasi, R/o Karadi, P.s. Marwar Junction Dist. Pali. (Lodged At District Jail, Jalore).

¶4

Shrawan Singh S/o Ajeet Singh, Aged About 22 Years, B/c Rajput, R/o Karadi, P.s. Marwar Junction Dist. Pali. (Lodged At District Jail, Jalore).

----Petitioners

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Narendra Singh Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶11

Order

¶12

18/10/2021

¶13

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 164/2021 registered at Police Station Ahore, District Jalore for the offence(s) under Sections 341, 323 read with 34 and 392 IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been wrongly implicated in this case. They are behind the bars since 5.8.2021. Charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners. Offence against the petitioners is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial may take long time. Hence, the petitioners be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-12213/2021]

¶17

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Voraram S/o Rataram and (2) Shrawan Singh S/o Ajeet Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Brijesh 30.

Voraram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Voraram v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Vs State

Mangi Lal @ Honey Vs State

Rakesh Vs State

Deepak Vs State

Ram Karan Vs State

Rakesh Vs State