Allowed

Shailendra Sinot @ Roky S/O Charanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Oct 2021CRLMB/10828/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed. The petitioner, confined since December 2020 in a case involving sections 420, 406, 467, 468 of IPC, was granted bail on furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.

Shailendra Sinot @ Roky S/O Charanlal Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10828/2021

¶3

Shailendra Sinot @ Roky S/o Charanlal, R/o Plot No. 5-6 Vaishnavi Vihar Special Bhadana Rangpur Road Kota Raj. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

		-	---Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Riyasat Ali,PP.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

25/10/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.124/2020 Registered at Police Station Nayapura, Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 of IPC.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. Petitioner is behind the bars since 22.12.2020. Chargesheet has been filed against the petitioner. Offence against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate. Conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-10828/2021]

¶17

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shailendra Sinot @ Roky S/o Charanlal shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶19

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶20

Seema/12

Shailendra Sinot @ Roky S/O Charanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Sinot @ Roky S/O Charanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Iqbal S/O Sidha Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Tailor @ Bunti Son of Shankerlal Tailor Vs State of Rajasthan

Poonam Swami Son of Satyanarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Pritam Sain S/O Shri Predeep Sain Vs State of Rajasthan

Arbaz Khan @ Sukka @ Pappu S/O Munna Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sattu Gurjar S/O Late Shri Raghunath Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan