Suresh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Bench dismissed the antecedent bail application under Section 438 CrPC, holding that the nature of allegations regarding forgery and misrepresentation precluded granting anticipatory bail without expressing an opinion on merits.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC dismissed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10769/2021
Suresh S/o Dharmpal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, 12 Ggm, Tehsil Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Suresh Nehra |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr. Rakesh Matoria with Mr. Vikas, for | |
| complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
Order
24/09/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to a petitioner apprehending arrest for alleged forgery to obtain Indian Army appointment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suresh
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Rameshwar Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10769/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court