Roshan Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The high court dismissed the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as not pressed by the petitioner, but granted liberty to file a fresh application after recording material witnesses.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to file fresh bail application after recording statements of material witnesses.
What the court decided
(1 of 1)
[CRLMB-10097/2021]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10097/2021
Roshan Lal S/o Sh. Sultan Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Vpo 1 Rtm, Ps Ramsinghpur, Tehsil Anupgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Sriganganagar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Raj., Through PP
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.R. Budania For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
22/10/2021
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail or liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording witness statements.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Roshan Lal
- respondent
State of Raj.
Coram
Deendra Kachhawaha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/10097/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court