Disposed

Rambabu Son of Banshilal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Sept 2021CRLMA/133/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court ordered that the request by the petitioner for videographic investigation of him and his family members be complied with, while noting that no indication of family nexus was found necessitating a change of the investigation agency.

What did the court decide?

The High Court ordered that videographic investigation of the petitioner and his family be carried out.

Rambabu Son of Banshilal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan — Money Laundering | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 133/2021

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 116/2021

¶5

Rambabu Son Of Banshilal Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Keshupura Ajmer Road Jaipur Raj.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶9

The Director General Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶10

The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, J-9, Jhalana, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶11

The Additional Superintendent Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, J-9, Jhalana, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶12

The Commisioner, Jaipur Development Authority, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. K. Gauttam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, PP

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

¶16

Order

¶17

13/09/2021

¶18

;g vkijkf/kd fofo/k izkFkZuk i= ,dyihB nkafMd fjV ;kfpdk la[;k 116@2021 eas fnukad 01-03-2021 dks ikfjr vkns’k esa la’kks/ku dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is’k fd;k x;k gSA

¶19

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMA-133/2021]

¶22

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk dguk gS fd ;kph ds ifjokn ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djus ds lkFk&lkFk mlds ifjokn la[;k ,p@3642@2016 ij izkjEHk dh x;h tkap iw.kZ djus ds funsZ’k fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk Hkh dh x;h Fkh] ysfdu mlds laca/k esa dksbZ vkns’k ikfjr ugha gqvk gS tks fd;k tkuk vko’;d gSA izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶23

mijksDr nkafMd fjV ;kfpdk esa ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 01-03-2021 ds }kjk ;kph ds ifjokn ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djus dh izkFkZuk [kkfjt dh tk pqdh gSA

¶24

;kph dh vksj ls mlds ifjokn ij ntZ dh x;h izkjfEHkd tkap dks iw.kZ fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, funsZ’k gS fd izLrqr ifjokn ij vko’;d tkap ;FkklaHko 'kh?kz fof/k&vuqlkj iw.kZ dh tk;sxhA

¶25

(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J

¶26

Mittal /123

Rambabu Son of Banshilal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambabu Son of Banshilal Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramvilas Meena S/O Kaluram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar Nagiya Son of Late Shri Jaidev Vs State of Rajasthan

Rishi Singh Son of Sumer Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kabool Singh and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Harinarayan Meena S/O Joraram Meena, Vs Smt. Shobha Devi W/O Ramesh Maheshari

Ramkishore and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.