In a bail cancellation application, the High Court found no ground to cancel bail for the accused respondents who were absent despite notice. The application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 103/2020
Johri Lal Meena S/o Sh. Dhanna Ram Meena, R/o Bada Ki Dhani Tan Sankotda Ps Andhi Dist. Jaipur
----Complainant-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Smt. Gyarsi Devi W/o Ramji Lal Meena, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Rasulpura Lalwas Jaipur
Ramkhiladi Meena S/o Sh. Johri Lal Meena, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Hingwala Neemla Jaipur Dist.
----Accused-Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Dhanna Ram (through video con- ference) |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, PP. None present for accused-respondent Nos.2 and 3. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
02/07/2021
None present on behalf of the accused-respondent Nos.2 and 3 after service of notice.
Heard learned counsel for the complainant-petitioner.
No ground for cancellation of bail to the accused-respondent Nos.2 and 3, is made out.
Dismissed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Seema/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether grounds exist to cancel the bail granted to the accused respondents.
Johri Lal Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Gyarsi Devi
Ramkhiladi Meena
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
