The High Court directed the Sessions Judge to summon witnesses under Section 311 CrPC to ensure fair trial for appellants, referencing Arnesh Kumar guidelines to bring the High Court's cognizance to the Criminal Appeal.
Direction to Sessions Judge to summon witnesses as per Section 311 CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1909/2021
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav GA cum AAG Mr. Bhim Singh Meena (For Compalainant)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
20/12/2021
izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk] dksrokyh ckjka] ftyk ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 546@2021 ds ekeys esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s ;g izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa vkSj mUgsa bl izdj.k eas feF;k fyIr fd;k tk jgk gSA vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh us /kkjk 41 na-iz-la- ds vkKkid izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk ugha dh gSA vius rdksZ dh iqf"V esa mUgksaus 2014(3) Crimes 40 (SC) Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Anr.,
(2 of 2)
[CRLAS-1909/2021]
Criminal Appeal No. 838 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No 5442/2021) Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr., decided on 16-8-2021, rFkk bl U;k;ky; }kjk S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 382/2018 order dated 28-2-2018, S. B Criminal Appeal No. 1155/2020 order dated 16-9-2020 ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd, gSaA blfy, /kkjk 41 na-iz-la- dh ikyuk djokbZ tkos vkSj ;fn vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk vfHk;qDrx.k dks fxjQrkj fd;k tkuk vko';d le>k tkrk gS rks fxjQrkjh ls iwoZ mudks rhu lIrkg dk uksfVl fn;k tk;s] rkfd vfHk;qDrx.k leqfpr fof/kd dk;Zokgh iqu% dj ldsA
tcfd fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us bldk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vfHk;qDrx.k dk vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
eSaus mi;qZDr ijLij fojks/kkHkklh rdksZ ij fopkj fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA /kkjk 41 na-iz-la- dh ikyuk djok;s tkus ij ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dks vkifRr ugha gSA vr% /kkjk 41 na-iz-la- dh ikyuk djok;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kkeLo:i vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd lEcfU/kr vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh] iqfyl Fkkuk&dksrokyh ckjka] ftyk ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 546@2021 esa /kkjk 41 na-iz-l- ds izko/kkuksa dh ikyuk djs vkSj /kkjk 41 na-iz-la- dh ikyuk ds i'pkr~ ;fn vuqla/kku ls vfHk;qDrx.k dks fxjQrkj fd;k tkuk vko';d le>k tk;s rks fxjQrkjh ls iwoZ vfHk;qDrx.k dks rhu lIrkg dk uksfVl fn;k tk;sA rRi'pkr~ fu;ekuqlkj vkxkeh dk;Zokgh dh tk;sA
rn~uqlkj vfxze tekur dk gLrxr izkFkZuk i= fu.khZr fd;k tkrk gSA
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
JSPanwar/43
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Sessions Judge to summon witnesses in light of Arnesh Kumar guidelines?
Whether a private complainant is entitled to summon persons before this High Court's direction?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Anr.Applied¶15
2014(3) Crimes 40 (SC) Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Anr.
(2 of 2)Referred¶16
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.Referred¶18
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 838 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No 5442/2021) Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 382/2018 order dated 28-2-2018Referred¶18
S. B Criminal Appeal No. 1155/2020 order dated 16-9-2020Referred¶18
Rudra Pratap Singh and Another
State of Rajasthan and Another
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
