Dismissed
Atma Ram and Anr. v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
Rajasthan HCCRES/339/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bench sanctioned by Single Judge that restoration application filed after a delay of 795 days could not be condoned as the delay was not bona fide or unintentional, dismissed the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and consequently dismissed the restoration application as time barred.
What did the court decide?
Application for condonation of delay was dismissed due to excessive and unexplained delay; consequently, the restoration application was dismissed as time barred.