Dismissed
A C T O Bhilwara v. M/S Sarita Water Tank System Bhilwara
Rajasthan HCCR/44/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[CR-44/2006]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 44/2006
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer, Ward II, Cirlce-B, Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s Sarita Water Tank System Bhilwara, Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Bhandari. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Order 23/03/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that arising from the same impugned order pertaining to different assessment year, revision petition filed by the petitioner being ACTO, Bhilwara v. M/s Sarita Water Tank System: S.B. Civil Sales Tax Revision No.42/2006 has been dismissed on 23.08.2013 and, therefore, the present revision petition may also be decided in terms of the said judgment.
By order dated 23.08.2013, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while deciding the revision petition, inter-alia, observed as under:-
“I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Revenue and perused the impugned orders.
The learned appellate authority as well as the learned Tax Board has recorded a concurrent finding of fact based on proper appreciation of materials on record while construing the circular issued by the State Government. Therefore, in my considered opinion, there is no infirmity, much less legal infirmity, in the impugned order passed by the learned Tax Board. In this view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the learned Tax Board.
(2 of 2)
[CR-44/2006]
The net result of the above discussion is that there is no merit in the revision petition and the same is accordingly dismissed.”
In view of the above, the revision petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed in light of order dated 23.08.2013 (Supra).
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
116-pradeep/-
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer, Ward II, Cirlce-B, Bhilwara
M/s Sarita Water Tank System Bhilwara
ARUN BHANSALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court