Special Appeal by State upheld as State is at liberty to proceed for recovery as respondents failed to file pending appeal against penalty within stipulated time despite earlier liberty granted.
State at liberty to proceed for recovery of penalty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 78/2008
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Bhansali Mr. Dixit Panwar Ms. Akanksha Sisodia For Respondent(s) : Mr. JL Purohit, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Shashank Joshi
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/01/2020
(2 of 3)
[SAW-78/2008]
consider the appeal on its own merits without raising any objection as to the limitation and pre-deposit of part of penalty amount in-question.
(3 of 3)
[SAW-78/2008]
private respondent within the time stipulated in the impugned judgment.
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ
27-Sanjay/-
State of Rajasthan
M/s Hind Syntes Ltd.
MRL Transport Pvt.Ltd.
Shyma Singh
INDRAJIT MAHANTY
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
