The High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, in an appeal against a writ petition, found that the underlying appeal had become infructuous and allowed it accordingly with no substantive discussion or reasons provided in the order.
The appeal was allowed as the underlying matter was rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 64/2020
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18406/2019
Pankaj Kumar Jain S/o Shri Anandi Lal Jain, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Jain, R/o 124/93, Agarwal Farm, Mansarovar Jaipur Rajasthan, Presently Apo At Joint Director, Secondary Education, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Meena, Additional Advocate General
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
24/02/2020
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that this
appeal has been rendered infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
(SABINA),J
Jatin/Gourav /08
Pankaj Kumar Jain
Umed Singh Jatav
State Of Rajasthan
SABINA
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
