Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the staterespondents submits that the qualifications had to be read in a wholesome manner and it cannot be interpreted as has been done by learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel submits that the post of Driver (Fire) has been included in category of ‘Fire Fighting’ under the Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinate & Ministerial Service) Rules, 1963, while there are other drivers, which are included in the category of ‘Motor Garage’ under the Rajasthan Municipal (Subordinate & Ministerial Service) Rules, 1963. The post of Driver (Fire) motor vehicles under the category of ‘Motor Garage’ requires holding driver license under the Motor Vehicles Act and similarly, for Fire Fighting, the Drivers (Fire) are also required to hold driving license under the Motor Vehicles Act. However, fire fighting equipment is a separate category altogether where a driver is required to have license of heavy Motor Vehicle. Since all the vehicles were fire fighting equipment, the same are heavy motor vehicles. The logical interpretation, therefore, for the qualifications of Drivers (Fire) would be that a candidate must possess at least heavy motor vehicle license. It is submitted that merely because, some other vehicles are being also used in the Fire Fighting Department, the petitioners cannot be appointed as
