High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning a representation regarding pension or similar benefits. The Court directed respondents to decide the representation within 30 days, allowing the petitioner to approach the Court again if necessary.
Directed respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7388/2020
Usman Gani Chhipa S/o Shri Karim Baksh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Kankroli, Santosh Nagar, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
| ----Respondents | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) |
: Mr. : |
Abhishek Sharma |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order
07/09/2020
In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if his representation is considered and decided by the respondents.
In light of such submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction
(2 of 2)
[CW-7388/2020]
to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from today strictly in accordance with law. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.
Stay petition also stands disposed of.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
112-Sphophaliya/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authorities should be directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within 30 days.
Usman Gani Chhipa
State Of Rajasthan
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
