Petitioner challenged him not being selected for a teaching post after selection criteria were revised by the Supreme Court. The High Court found no merit in the petition as the petitioner did not even appear in the initial select list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 515/2019
Ritesh Kumar S/o Laxminarayan Soni, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Bani, Tehsil Pachapahar, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Palia for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
24/02/2020
(2 of 2)
[CW-515/2019]
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SUNIL SOLANKI /19/463
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition maintaining a claim for appointment as a teacher after subsequent judicial modification of selection criteria is maintainable.
Whether the petitioner derives any benefit from the Supreme Court judgment in Vikash Kumar Shankhla's case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikash Kumar ShankhlaReferred¶15
Vikash Kumar Shankhla's case
Ritesh Kumar
The State Of Rajasthan
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
