Allowed

Sunita D/O Sh. Jagat Singh,W/O-Uttam Kumar v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Feb 2020CW/1184/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Jaipur allowed a writ petition seeking bonus marks for ANM workers on PPP mode, relying on a recent coordinate bench judgment from Jodhpur. The court ordered respondents to consider experience certificates and allot marks subject to scrutiny.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to allot bonus marks to petitioners based on experience certificates subject to scrutiny.

Sunita D/O Sh. Jagat Singh,W/O-Uttam Kumar Vs the… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJ.ASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1184/2020

¶3

Sunita D/o Sh. Jagat Singh,w/o-Uttam Kumar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- Vpo-Bhawthari, Teh-Surajgarh, District-Jhunjhunu, (Raj .)

¶4

Versus

¶5

I. The State Of Rajasthan, . *, Through Its Principal Secretary, % E$ @.A-..:

¶6

e Medical And r .,%: % edth~~~~fi~~;tf~~~~rtariat, ::cfld i' :)' ***..,** +2 Jaipur. % 3&.Er"" '" :g. -jjr

¶7

2. The ire%b$;Pledical And Health ~C?rv@& Tilak Marg C- a,?, .&-%$

¶8

.. %.?. h .

¶9

ch:gi$p$i~ur Rajasthan.

¶10

.X' "*

¶11

yp4* ;s*' * ..f .

¶12

1. The?-Additional Director (Administration), M.l-i,cal And zPLdrrawgY g'> -y ,=Hgalth Services, Tilak Marg C-Scheme, Jaipur ajaskhan.

¶13

The Chief M

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

Khajani D/o 42 Years, R/

¶16

(Raj.

¶17

----Petitioner

¶18

,+" ~'>-VS-' ,jz 3 ! $ .*,-&:,?).-.~,wr T%>l 6s **i&f<d** >

¶19

&g;$pi,:;:::;g;3;p>f<

¶20

1. Pri n ci pal Secrets ry, The State Of ipydstban;$@QG~~$s J:: A++. q$m%?;&Qr gy+, 4 Medical And H&t&$Bqga&5mhit:rSecretariat, '. ? a. tewq&+p&-zsgtd+ Jaipur. @*&;~&~~&;$

¶21

1. The Director, Med,ial .&nd.: Health:Services, Tilak Marg, C- **5 .%>*vs+'w<**@&%T* ~%&p%$j+,

¶22

Scheme, i~~~;#&.~~~h, . . .:.-?ei..~ g %$.3waz r! F .$iJ ". F .

¶23

1. The Additional Directo-r (Administration), Medical And Health Services, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶24

1. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nagaur,raj.

¶25

For Petitioner(s)

¶26

: Mr. Rajesh Gadwal Mr. Naveen Dhuwan

¶27

For .Respondent(s)

¶28

: Dr. Harshal Tholia, Adv. on behalf of Dr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, AAG Mr. Ashish Saini Adv., Mr. Shyam Arya Adv:

¶29

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

¶30

Judqment I Order

¶31

The petitioners has,worked-r as, a ANM on PPP Mode but ; , , ;'kt it 3- & , <t.' 9% .p.+*, , , . * .&%, P;' her/him experie?nc$has t&&, : not been cu'fike@ ,.% %k.17 " . granting bo:rigs;marks. '.ip' TQe=:petitions are covered by the judgment i.,; X court in the case of Sunita Vs. State of Raiasthan decided on

¶32

19.2.2020 wherein t by Coordinate Bench : Seat, Jodhpur in in the case of

¶33

decided on 10.8.201 Division Bench of this co

¶34

gment passed by the eat Jodhpur in State of .B.Civil Special Appeal

¶35

and held as under: "In view of the j d by the coordinate 'pb. Bench of this Corfraifip~[~~seat, ?""?j+ "4 4 \ Jodhpur, the 3;. .\ ,, $**.$ f$ petitioners in the present bunch of writ petitions are held entitled to be given the benefit of bonus marks on the basis of their experience certificates for the respective posts. The petitioners shall submit a copy of this judgement alongwith an application before the respondents mentioning the posts for which they have applied and the respondents shall consider the experience certificate and if the same is found to be in order, shall accordingly allot marks to the petitioners by adding bonus marks. The inclusion of the petitioners in the select list on the basis of addition of the aforesaid bonus

¶36

marks would, however, be always subject to scrutiny of their experience certificate and even after appointment, if later on, it is found that the experience certificate submitted by them is in any manner having any mistake or is forged, the concerned incumbent would be given a show cause notice and thereafter his services can be dispensed with after examining reply. 11

¶37

Accordingly, all T these m p4 lt?ti
6$?v2 ,; &
order/judgmentCpa.sse,d5 .,.., ;&-' Ti*y this c
.?%% 'Iffff
..<$ .j&?&%
shall appl~~~rrp7utatis mutandis
>ypYf
petitio~g;!
T$?:
Anu /

Sunita D/O Sh. Jagat Singh,W/O-Uttam Kumar v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita D/O Sh. Jagat Singh,W/O-Uttam Kumar v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babita D/O Shri Ranjeet Singh, W/O Shri Narotam Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Madhu D/O Sh. Daya Shankar, W/O-Dalesh Kumar Kushwah Vs the State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Atal S/O Sohan Lal Atal Vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board

Rekha Meena W/O Shri Sua Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Priyanshu Rathore Wife of Shri Pradeep Singh Naruka Vs the Director, Secondary Education

Ram Niwas S/O Late Shri Bhagirath Ram Vs State of Rajasthan