Bhanwar Singh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court set aside conviction and imprisonment for cheque bounce offences upon proving compromise between petitioner and complainant, conditioned on deposit of 15% cost.
What did the court decide?
Conviction and sentence set aside; petitioner to deposit 15% of cheque amount as cost with Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority within twenty days.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 72/2020
Bhanwar Singh S/o Motilal Rawat, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Rawat, R/o 34-B, Gali No.1, Subhash Nagar, District Udaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Through Pp
- Babu Lal Rawat S/o Bhagwan Lal Rawat, By Caste Rawat, age about 44 years, R/o Thokar Chouraha, Udaipur (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dashrath Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP Mr. Bharat Shrimali, for respondent No.2
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction and sentence for Section 138 NI Act offences can be set aside upon parties entering into a compromise.
Whether a cost liability can be imposed on the petitioner for entering into the compromise after appeal rejection.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhanwar Singh
- respondent
State
- respondent
Babu Lal Rawat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/72/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court