The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging an order of taking cognizance, granting the petitioner liberty to file a revision.
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to file revision petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CRLMP-408/2020]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 408/2020
Sunil @ Khushi S/o Ram Dayal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kumharo Ki Choki, Near Koliyo Ke Kua, Kali Paltan, Tonk, Ps Kotwali, Tehsil And District Tonk, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
Buddhi Prakash S/o Late Sh. Chhitar Lal, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Near Chimni, Dhanna Talai, Tonk, Ps Kotwali, Tonk, Tehsil And District Tonk, Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Order
04/08/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file revision petition challenging the impugned order of taking cognizance.
The prayer sought for is allowed.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for.
(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J
Arun/98
Sunil @ Khushi
Buddhi Prakash
Satish Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
