Allowed

Juber S/O Fajarudin Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2020CRLMB/934/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. relating to offences under IPC 420 and 406. The court directed police to release the petitioner on producing a bond and sureties if arrested.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, subject to specified conditions

Juber S/O Fajarudin Mev Vs State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 934/2020

¶3

Juber S/o Fajarudin Mev, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Vill. Chhapar Ps Tapukda Tehsil Tijara Dist. Alwar

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma (through video conference) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP.

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

18/09/2020

¶11

The present anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.453/2019 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, Alwar for the offence under Sections 420, 406 of IPC.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation levelled against the petitioner is that he was mediator in the transaction. As per the investigation, there is no signature of the petitioner on the receipt.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application.

¶14

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-934/2020]

¶17

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶18

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Bhiwadi, Alwar in FIR No.453/2019 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Juber S/o Fajarudin Mev he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶19

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶20

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶21

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶22

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶23

Seema/4

Juber S/O Fajarudin Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juber S/O Fajarudin Mev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazeer Mohd Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Mohammad Harun Rasheed S/O Mohammad Hussan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Harun Rasheed S/O Mohammad Husain B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip Kumar S/O Shri Tarachand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Altaf S/O Haroon Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhota Bai W/O Aladeen Vs State of Rajasthan