Chunnilal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order records that the petitioner voluntarily withdrawn the bail application, retaining liberty to revive the prayer later. Consequently, the application was dismissed as not pressed. No substantive legal principle was articulated.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 841/2020
Chunnilal S/o Shri Sukhram Bishnoi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Thali Ka Bera Deegaon, Police Station Karda, District Jalore. (At Present Lodged At District Jail Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishant Bora. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
10/02/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the instant bail application at this stage with liberty to revive the prayer for bail after statement of the seizure officer/ investigating officer is recorded before the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chunnilal S/o Shri Sukhram Bishnoi
- respondent
State
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/841/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court