Shankerlal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed an interim bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. despite the petitioner's argument that his father had recently expired, holding that he did not constitute a fit case for release.
What did the court decide?
Temporary bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Temporary Bail Application No. 7482/2020
Shankerlal S/o Ramkaran, Aged About 45 Years, Goudu, Presently Chak 7 Psd, Fulasar, Police Station, Bajju, District Bikaner. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Bikaner).
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishant Bora, through video call For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
04/08/2020
The present temporary bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.173/2018, Police Station Bajju, District Bikaner for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 506, 447, 323, 341, 148, 149 of IPC.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether temporary bail should be granted given the recent death of the petitioner's father.
If the petitioner's father's death constitutes a sufficient ground to enlarge him on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shankerlal S/o Ramkaran
- respondent
State
Coram
Devendra Kachhawa
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/7482/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court