Allowed

Ranveer Kumar Singh@Pappu Singh S/O Rajendra Prasad Singh @ Harkit Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2020CRLMB/7449/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of the accused petitioner, invoking Section 439 Cr.P.C., noting that the investigating officer had stated there was no evidence connecting the petitioner to the charged offence of murder and causing death to cover up the crime.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ and two sureties of Rs.50,000/ each, subject to appearance on all subsequent dates of hearing.

Ranveer Kumar Singh@Pappu Singh S/O Rajendra… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7449/2020

¶3

Ranveer Kumar Singh@pappu Singh S/o Rajendra Prasad Singh @ Harkit Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Misri Many Adda Ps Jamui Bihar At Present Katoriya Dist. Banka Bihar Present Address Kanta Toil Bangali Toda Road No 06 Ranchi Sathit Situ Chakravarti Ke Makan Ke Doosre Floor Main Kirayedar Ps Loyer Bazaar Dist. Ranchi (Accused In Dist. Jail Alwar)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R R Goyal For State : Mr. S S Mahla, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶10

Judgment / Order

¶11

20/11/2020

¶12

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

F.I.R. No.82/2014 was registered at Police Station Mahuwa

¶14

Distt. Dausa for offence under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C.

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that police has not collected any evidence against the petitioner. Investigating Officer was summoned by the Court and he stated before the Court that there is nothing to connect the petitioner with the crime.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-7449/2020]

¶19

I have considered the contentions.

¶20

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶21

This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

¶22

so.

¶23

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶24

ARTI SHARMA /8

Ranveer Kumar Singh@Pappu Singh S/O Rajendra Prasad Singh @ Harkit Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranveer Kumar Singh@Pappu Singh S/O Rajendra Prasad Singh @ Harkit Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Pooja Devi Saini W/O Lt. Shri Mukesh Saini B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay Vaishnav @ Mama S/O Mohanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Saurabh Mangal S/O Shri Babaluram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mubarik @ Mubba S/O Aasu Vs State of Rajasthan

Renu Kumar Jain S/O Shri Ratan Lal Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Kabbu Beg @ Mangilal S/O Sh. Wahid Beg Vs State of Rajasthan