Petitioner withdrew the criminal bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. but sought liberty to file a fresh application after receiving the statement of the Seizure Officer. The Court granted liberty and dismissed the application not pressed.
Liberty granted to file a fresh bail application after furnishing the statement of the Seizure Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6308/2020
Mohan Banodha S/o Amba Lal Banodha, Aged About 23 Years, Ward No. 23, Water Works Road, Jatiyawas, P.s. Kotwali Pratapgarh, District Pratapgarh. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Chittorgarh).
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Through CBN
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birbal Ram Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Mathur for Mr. N.K Rai, Special Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Order
11/08/2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application, however, seeks liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after statement of Seizure Officer.
Accordingly, this bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for.
(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J
10-akshay/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application seeks to be withdrawn and the petitioner should be accorded liberty to file a fresh application later.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohan Banodha
Union Of India
DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
