The High Court of Rajasthan granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners confined in sub-jail, observing a delay in producing them before the special court regarding their arrest.
Bail granted to the three petitioners to appear on specified dates before the Special Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 394/2020
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 394/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %% ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh fojsUnz xksnkjkA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vrqy 'kekZA
2
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 394/2020
vkns'k fnukad 06-02-2020
U;k;ky; }kjk %
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g izkFkZuk i= i z Lrqr dj tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k dk rdZ jgk fd os izkFkhZ la[;k&2 cuokjhyky dh gn rd tekur vkosnu ij cy ugha nsrs gSaA
'ks"k izkFkhZx.k la[;k&1 o 3 dze'k% jes'kpan ,oa lksuw dqekj ds dze esa mudk dFku jgk fd i{kksa ds e/; ?kVuk ek= cPpksa ds chp vkilh dgklquh dks ysdj gqbZ gS] i{kdkjku vkil esa utnhdh fj'rsnkj gSaA mDr nksukas izkFkhZx.k ij vkgrk dkS'kY;k ds xEHkhj pksV igqapkus dk vkjksi ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k orZeku esa U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSaA vr% tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k
fd;kA
leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] cgl ds nkSjku izLrqr rdksZa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZx.k la[;k&1 o 3 dze'k% jes'kpan ,oa lksuw dqekj dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr gSA
3
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 394/2020
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ la[;k&2 cuokjhyky ds dze esa
izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu cy ugha fn;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
izkFkhZx.k la[;k&1 o 3 dze'k% jes'kpan ,oa lksuw dqekj ds dze esa ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn mDr nksuksa izkFkhZx.k esa ls izR;sd izkFkhZ iqfyl Fkkuk] NhikcM+kSn ftyk ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &362@2019 ds ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners who are awaiting trial in a criminal case.
Whether any delay in producing the petitioners before the court is a bar to granting bail.
Ramesh Chand S/o Mohanlal B/c Dhakar
Banwarilal S/o Mohanlal B/c Dhakar
Sonu Kumar S/o Banwarilal B/c Dhakar
State Of Rajasthan
Unknown
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
