Allowed

Yogesh Jangid v. State

Rajasthan HC11 May 2020CRLMB/3298/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a cheating and forgery case covered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 384 and 120B IPC. Due to COVID-19 lockdown constraints, the Court released the petitioner on personal bond with an option to furnish two sureties by 30.05.2020.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with option to furnish two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each by 30.05.2020.

Yogesh Jangid Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3298/2020

¶3

Yogesh Jangid S/o Bal Mukund Jangid, Aged About 30 Years, Arya Samaj Road, Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Bhilwara).

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rajendra Singh Charan, through Jitsi Meet App
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
For cmoplainant(s)	: Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gurjar, through Jitsi Meet App

¶9

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶10

Order

¶11

11/05/2020

¶12

This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.54/2020, Police Station Bhimganj, District Bhilwara, for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 384 and 120B IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR lodged against the petitioner came to be lodged after two years and the petitioner is behind the bars since 25.02.2020, for a case which is triable by Magistrate.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Learned counsel for the complainant, vehemently opposing the bail application, submitted that the petitioner has not only taken money from the complainant but has also cheated other persons.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-3298/2020]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. The petitioner Yogesh Jangid /o Shri Bal Mukund Jangid, arrested in FIR No.54/2020, Police Station Bhimganj, District Bhilwara shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

¶20

This Court is of the view that in the prevailing circumstances of complete lock-down amidst spread of COVID-19, furnishing of two sureties will be difficult on the one hand and the same may pose eminent threat to the concerned. It is, therefore, ordered that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing the personal bond. He may furnish requisite sureties by 30.05.2020 to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

¶21

It would be required of the concerned Superintendent of Police/Jailer to apprise the petitioner about consequence of violation of the bond as stipulated in Section 229A of the Indian Penal Code, while releasing the petitioner on bail.

¶22

Petitioner shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. In case, he fails to furnish surety bonds by the stipulated time, the instant order will come to an end automatically.

¶23

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶24

3-skm/-

Yogesh Jangid v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Jangid v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahadev Sihag Vs State

Naveen Mewara Vs the State of Rajasthan

Anirudh Vs the State

Jenaram Vs State

Chhoga Ram Vs State

Asim Khan Vs State of Rajasthan