Allowed

Mohan Lal v. State

Rajasthan HC5 May 2020CRLMB/3183/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur allowed bail to mohan lal in the undertrial proceedings of section 306 ipc on a date to be fixed, noting despite his presence in judicial custody no attempt to bring back the accused has been made and judicial custody is not available.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on a date to be fixed; to be released on judicial bail upon bringing back for bail.

Mohan Lal Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3183/2020

¶3

Mohan Lal S/o Duni Ram, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Jat, Resident Of Durjana, Police Station Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Nohar)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : O;fDr”k% dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA For Respondent(s) : O;fDr”k% dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

¶9

Order

¶10

05/05/2020

¶11

fo'o LokLF; laxBu ¼MCY;w- ,p-vks-½] jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ,oa dsUnzh; ,oa jkT; ljdkj }kjk uksoy dksjksuk ok;jl ¼dksfoM&19½ds xaHkhj egkekjh ,oa laØe.k dks QSyus ls jksdus ,oa fu;a=.k ds fy;s tkjh ,Mokbtjh ds dkj.k izdj.k esa izkFkhZ ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk Jh fouksn dqekj flgkx ,oa fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,l-ds- HkkVh dks tfj;s fofM;ks dkWy lquk x;kA

¶12

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk] uksgj ftyk guqekux<+ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k% 75@2020 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 306Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s ;g izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

izkFkhZ ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk }kjk fuosnu fd;k fd izkFkhZ fnukad 28-02-2020 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gS rFkk izkFkhZ ls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gSA izkFkhZ dk dksbZ dkWy fMVsy ugha gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA

¶14

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-3183/2020]

¶15

fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fojks/k djrs gq;s tkfgj fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo:) /kkjk 306 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vkjksi gS rFkk izdj.k esa vHkh rd egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku ugha gq;s gSA

¶16

i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶17

izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ,oa vijk/k dh izd`fr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd;s fcuk] izkFkh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gksus ls [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶18

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr xokg jksfgrk”k] fouksn o vyh “ks[k ds U;k;ky; esa c;ku gksus ds i”pkr~ iqu% tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus ds fy;s Lora= jgsxkA

¶19

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

¶20

6-AK/-

Mohan Lal v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Lal v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalchand Vs State

Manohar Lal Vs State

Chandan Singh Vs State

Aslam Hussain Vs State

Bheemraj Vs State

Dashrath Vs State