Allowed

Ramkesh@Tuppi S/O Ramkalyan B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jan 2020CRLMB/13695/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan entertained a bail application by Ramkesh @ Tuppi, who was already confined in the district jail. The court allowed the petitioner a bail by setting conditions and permitting leave to be obtained from a magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail with conditions, including the requirement of an interim bail bond and seeking leave from the magistrate for execution.

Ramkesh@Tuppi S/O Ramkalyan B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj

¶3

vkns'k

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶5

13695/2019

¶6

Ramkesh @ Tuppi S/o Ramkalyan B/c Meena, R/o Ninddada Police Station Soorwal Dist. Sawaimadhopur (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Sawaimadhopur)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

vkns'k fnukad 3-1-2020

¶12

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶13

izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh r:.k tSu yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,l ,l vksyk

¶14

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= ij nksuksa i{kksa ds rdZ lqus x;sA

¶15

izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ij vkgr ds 'kjhj ij Qk;j fd, tkus dk vkjksi ugha gSa rFkk vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ftu ij vkgr ds lkFk ekjihV dk vkjksi gS] dh tekur bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA mudk dFku jgk fd vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds miyC/k gksus ek= ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl ekeys ls tksMk x;k gSA mudk dFku jgk fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA vr%

¶16

¶17

mDr rdksZ ds vk/kkj ij izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk ?kksj fojks/k

¶19

fd;kA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶21

izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk izkFkhZ }kjk vkgr ij Qk;j ugha fd, tkus rFkk vU; vfHk;qDrx.k dh tekur iwoZ eas led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj fd, tkus ds dze esa izLrqr fd, x;s rdksZa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ er vfHkO;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

vr% izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= fuEu 'krZ ds lkFk Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ jkeds'k mQZ VqIih fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kkuqlkj :i;s 50]000@& ¼v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o :i;s 25]000&25]000@& dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ dks iqfyl Fkkuk lwjoky ftyk lokbZ ek/kksiqj ij iathc} izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 221@2018 esa] ;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶23

¼U;k0 egsUnz ekgs'ojh½

¶24

ts,liaokj@5

Ramkesh@Tuppi S/O Ramkalyan B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkesh@Tuppi S/O Ramkalyan B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Rajoriya S/O Shri Khemchand Rajoriya B/C Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Kumar S/O Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav B/C Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemraj@Rangila S/O Shri Chittar Lal Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Gupta S/O Shri Yadram Gupta B/C Mahajan Vs State of Rajasthan

Madan Mohan Goyal S/O Shri Budh Prakash Goyal B/C Vaishya Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangi Lal S/O Shri Jaluram B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan