Allowed
Brajesh Kumar Sahu S/O Munna Lal @ Mansukh Das Sahu B/C Shau v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCCRLMB/135/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Misc. Bail Application No. 135/ 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
Misc. Bail Application No. 135/ 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 135/ 2020
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 135/2020
Brajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Munna Lal @ Mansukh Das Sahu B/c Shau, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Makaan No 380 Talaiya Mohalla Ps Kotwali Dist. Jhansi (Up) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh vfuy dqekj mieuA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh iz'kkUr 'kekZA
vkns'k fnukad 03-02-2020
U;k;ky; }kjk %
izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g izkFkZuk i= i z Lrqr dj tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZ gSA
2
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 135/ 2020
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd ftl MhMh ds dze esa izkFkhZ dks bl izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr cuk;k x;k gS] ml MhMh dh jkf'k izkFkhZ ds [kkrs esa tek ugha gksdj] vU; O;fDr jruyky ds [kkrs esa tek gqbZ gS vkSj mlls izkFkhZ dk dksbZ ysuknsuk ugha gSA ekeyk o"kZ 1994 dk gSA orZeku esa izkFkhZ U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA vr% tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k
fd;kA
leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] izLrqr rdksZa ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij jk; O;Dr fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ c`ts'k dqekj lkgw dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ iqfyl Fkkuk] ykydksBh ftyk t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 58@1994 ds ekeys esa ;ksX; fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in the pending criminal proceedings.
Whether the petitioner, a member of a Scheduled Caste, meets the criteria of Section 58(1)(a) of the S.C./S.T. Rules, 1994.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
D.P. Chopra GroupReferred
D.P. Chopra Group
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Brajesh Kumar Sahu / Munna Lal @ Mansukh Das Sahu
State Of Rajasthan
J. J.B.Pardiwala
J. V.S. Sirpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court