The criminal appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant had failed to remove registry defects and was not present on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[CRLAS-1143/2019]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1143/2019
Manish Mali S/o Shri Mannalal, Aged About 38 Years, By Caste Mali, Resident Of Bus Stand, Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None present
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
07/01/2020
This appeal was presented on 02.07.2018. On 25.10.2018, certain defects were pointed out by Registry. The defects pointed out by office have not been removed by the appellant till date.
Today, no one is present to pursue the matter. It appears that the appellant has lost interest in the matter. The criminal appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
4-NK/-
Manish Mali
Sunil Surana
State of Rajasthan
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
