Anya v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal appeal was abated as the reported bailable warrants revealed that the appellant-applicant-Anya Ram Saini had expired 25 years prior to the order date, a fact uncontested by counsel.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 90/1989
Anya
----Appellant
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Order
25/02/2020
Vide order dated 20.12.2019, bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.5,000/- to secure the presence of accused appellant, was ordered to be issued.
On the report of the aforesaid warrants, it is mentioned that the accused-appellant-Anya Ram Saini S/o Nanag Ram Saini, resident of Baharavanda, Tehsil Sikarai, District Dausa, expired 25 years ago.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anya
- respondent
State
Coram
Goverdhan Bardhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/90/1989
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court