Single judge order allowing withdrawal of S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 47/2015 by Petitioner-Defendant Indus Hotels Corporation Limited and dismissing the petition. No substantive legal issues discussed.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw the revision petition; the revision petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 47/2015
Indus Hotels Corporation Limited (IHCL), registered office at 4, Mango Lane, Kolkata through Managing Director/Authorised Representative (merged with E.I.H. Associated Hotels Limited in the year 2005 pursuant to the Orders Passed by the Hon’ble madras and Kolkata High Courts)
----Petitioner-Defendant
Versus
1.Smt Maheshwari Devi wife of Late Shri Radhey Shyam, aged 49 years, by caste Brahmin, resident of Kalyanji Ka Mandir, Behind Shahpura Bagh, Opposite Jalmahal Amber Road, Jaipur through her registered power of Attorney Holder Brijesh Singh son of Shri Shivjatan Singh, aged 39 years, by caste Rajput, Resident of Plot No. 172-A, Engineers Colony, Sirsi Road, Panchyawala Jaipur
----Respondent-Plaintiff
Performa-Respondents.
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Bansal Mr. Akshay Sharma, Addl. Govt.
(2 of 2)
[CR-47/2015]
counsel
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA
Order
07/01/2020
Matter has come up on an application (IA No.1/2020) for withdrawal of the instant revision petition.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and revision petition is dismissed accordingly.
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
Mohit Rohila /101
Indus Hotels Corporation Limited
Maheshwari Devi
Mool Chand
Chandani Properties Private Limited
Vijay Pooniya
Ashok Khanna
Prakash Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
