The petitioner did not appear despite notice. The High Court dismissed the contempt petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 46/2020
in
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 964/2018
in
D.B. Civil Special (Writ) No. 663/2013
Balhit Siksha Samiti, Swami Dayanand Marg, Alwar (Raj) Through Its Secretary Tarachand Son Of Sampat Ram Aged About 65 Years, Tara Bhawan, Station Road, Alwar (Raj)
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
02/09/2020
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
(2 of 2)
[CCP-46/2020]
On the last date also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, nor PF/Extra Paper Book Set have been filed. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
(SABINA),J
Anil Makwana /20
Balhit Siksha Samiti, through Tarachand
Smt. Manju Rajpaal
State Of Rajasthan
Sabina
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
