Tasvir Bai v. Branch Manager R S R T C Bundi
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was not present on the date of hearing.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was not present on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2646/2006
Branch Manager R S R T C Bundi
Versus,
Tasvir Bai And Ors
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Cross Obje,ctipn Civil No. 122/2009
Tasvir Bai 3 I > ?:. I I,
;,< $ i.i
,
-j ----Appellant
1 k- Versus
-
Branch anger R S R T C Bundi
i 'i/
4.;- ,&
3 ----~es$ondent
Tasvir Bai
----~es$ondent
_*<z-?-;z--i-::-_ For Appellant(s) **pp.** : **_.*Lrs2b_** * **-:t?** ~o'n~?,~r$esent -: **_a_** ,z * +:'. *.A -r? **_d._** $.- - **_:4_** ... **_3_** ) _7_ \ For Respondent(s) (-.* _ph@?J~E~.2,_ 'k+.N i Cip$J.a 1 **_Q_** , **.In: :a",-.*-** ,, _... **_7C*i_ 4** Ti.5 ? :;" > P. ; u ..
HON'BLE
03/09/2019
None present for
The appeal and for want of prosecution. G-.- -..-- A:-- -. ,2:.2:--.:, =. ;*, -, :-- , rj, %L c.; f, v-..x:2:j .-- I &$ " y A & *: %! $ i;sr i I.. i I, ( I @ 7: 4 ~i J
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
Tasvir Bai
Branch Manager R S R T C Bundi
Prakash Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court