Review petition dismissed as no grounds existed and a notification under Section 101 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 had already been issued before hearing. Quality: thin.
Review petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 216/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hapu Ram For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Beniwal, AAG
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
04/12/2019
After hearing learned counsel for the review petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General, we find no ground to entertain the present review petition since no justifiable ground for exercising the review jurisdiction has been made out.
We further take note of the fact that learned Additional Advocate General brings to our notice that in the meantime,
(2 of 2)
[WRW-216/2019]
notification under Section 101 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 has already been published.
The review petition is accordingly dismissed.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ
94-Sudheer/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bholaram S/o Shri Gokalram
Hukmaram Choudhary S/o Shri Bastaram Choudhary
State Of Rajasthan
Mr. Indrajit Mahanty
Dr. Justice Pushendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
