In a writ contempt petition, the petitioner claimed an interim order passed by the High Court had been complied with by the respondents. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition without separate findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S. B. Writ Contempt No. 583/2019
Balendra Kumar Garasiya S/o Saka Ram Garasiya, aged about 29 years, Resident of Village Ghata (Patiya) Post and Gram Panchayat Gogrud, Tehsil Kotada, District Udaipur (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order
14/08/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present contempt petition, the Order dated 13.08.2018 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11112/2018 has been complied with by the respondents and therefore, nothing survives in the contempt petition.
The contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
81-Inder/-
Balendra Kumar Garasiya
State of Rajasthan
Shri Gaurav Chatirvedi
Shri Om Prakash Kashess
Shri Kamar Choudhary
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
