In an appeal filed against the rejection of a suspension of sentence application, the High Court held that no grounds for suspension existed as the case involved a minor prosecutrix with specific allegations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence Application
No.73/2019
IN
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 104/2019
Sabu @ Sahab Lal S/o Ram Niwas Meena, R/o Gohata Ps Lakheri Dist. Bundi Raj. (Accused Appellant Is In Dist. Jail Bundi)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal For State : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
06/03/2019
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Amit/8
2 issues framed by the court
Whether grounds for suspension of sentence are made out in a case where the prosecutrix is a minor alleging specific offences.
Whether the application for suspension of sentence should be rejected.
Sabu @ Sahab Lal S/o Ram Niwas Meena
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
