Anil v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In an appeal for suspension of sentence, the High Court allowed the application treating the appellant's case as non-distinguishable from a co-accused who previously obtained similar relief. The court granted bail with specific attendance and surety conditions under Section 389 Cr.P.C.
What did the court decide?
Suspension of sentence allowed; bail granted on bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Second Suspension Of Sentence(Appeal) No. 356/2019
Anil S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Sunar R/o Adar Ps -Matloda Now Harinagar Colony Kachi Fatak Model Town Panipat. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Gill For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.S.Bhati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
05/04/2019
Heard learned counsel for the applicant-appellant and learned Public Prosecutor on the instant second application for suspension of sentence.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant-appellant is entitled to suspension of sentence given that co-accused received similar relief.
Whether bail conditions for suspended sentence are sufficient to ensure appearance in court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil S/o Hari Singh
- respondent
State
Coram
Sandeep Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- SOSA/356/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court