Allowed

Banwari Lal @ Damakya S/O Shri Bhagwana Ram B/C Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jan 2019SOSA/1071/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence. The bench ordered the sentence to remain suspended upon the appellant furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, directing the concerned court to serve copies.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the 3rd application for suspension of sentence; sentence to remain suspended upon furnishing a bond and two sureties.

Banwari Lal @ Damakya S/O Shri Bhagwana Ram B/C Jat Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. 3^rd Suspension of Sentence Application No.1071/2018

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 717/2012

¶5

Banwari Lal @ Damakya S/o Shri Bhagwana Ram, by caste Jat, R/o Govindpura, Police Station Fatehpur Sadar, District Siker. (At present confined in Jail).

¶6

----Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vijay Pal Yadav. For State : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶12

Order

¶13

02/01/2019

¶14

Heard on 3rd application for suspension of sentence.

¶15

It is contended by counsel for the appellant that the sentence of appellant was suspended by the court below on 19.03.2014. As appellant did not appear before the Court, warrant was issued against him and he was arrested. It is contended that similarly situated co-accused also did not appear before the Court and his application has been allowed. Appellant has remained in custody for a period of one year and eight months.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the 3^rd application for suspension of sentence.

¶17

Considering the contention of counsel for the appellant, the 3^rd application for suspension of sentence deserves to be allowed.

¶18

[CRLA-717/2012]

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

Accordingly, the 3^rd application for suspension of sentence is allowed. It is ordered that the sentence awarded to accusedappellant in Sessions Case No. 80/2010 shall remain suspended if the appellant furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court to the effect that he shall appear before this Court as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court by fax/email today itself with a direction to serve a photostat copy of the same to the appellant/s and an additional copy of this order be also sent to the concerned Court by ordinary process.

¶22

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶23

Chandan/1

Banwari Lal @ Damakya S/O Shri Bhagwana Ram B/C Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banwari Lal @ Damakya S/O Shri Bhagwana Ram B/C Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Rinwa Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Bhagwan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Ghurab Hasan Ahmed Saeed Al Khawlani Vs Union of India and Anr.

Pooran and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Satish Kumar Circle Officer Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Bhawani Singh S/O Shri Bajrang Singh Shekhawat B/C Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp