Disposed

The Secretary, v. Ilashree Yogi D/O Sant Nath Yogi

Rajasthan HC6 Dec 2019SAW/304/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This special appeal was disposed of without independent adjudication. The Court ruled that the matter be disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 23.01.2019 passed in D. B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1475/2018 filed in the underlying writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms of judgment dated 23.01.2019 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1475/2018.

The Secretary, Vs Ilashree Yogi D/O Sant Nath Yogi — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

D. B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 304/2019

¶3

¶4

S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16973/2017

¶5

The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, Rajasthan

¶6

----Appellant/Respondent

¶7

Versus

¶8

Ilashree Yogi D/o Sant Nath Yogi, Aged about 29 years, R/o Shiv Colony, Near Prince School, Ward No. 18, Palwas Road, Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶9

Respondent/Petitioner

¶10

The State of Rajasthan through its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶11

The Director, Prosecution, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶12

----Proforma/Respondents

¶13

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mirza Faisal Baig.

¶14

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶15

Judgment

¶16

06/12/2019

¶17

Appellant has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 28.08.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge.

¶18

During the course of arguments, it has transpired that D. B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1475/2018 filed by the State against the order dated 28.08.2018 was disposed of by this Court on 23.01.2019.

¶19

Operative part of judgment dated 23.01.2019 passed in D. B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1475/2018 filed in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16973/2017 reads as under:

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[SAW-304/2019]

¶22

“ 20. We would be failing not to highlight that there is a public interest litigation pending in this Court seeking appointment of more Assistant Prosecution Officers for vacancies which had occurred after the year 2015. Progress of criminal trials in the subordinate courts is held up on account of nonavailability of adequate numbers of prosecuting officers. It also cannot be overlooked by us that the mandamus issued by the Division Bench of this Court which we have noted hereinabove requires the State to fill up all the notified vacancies without any caveat.

¶23

21. Affirming the view taken by the learned Single Judge and clarifying that decision by the learned Single Judge would not mean that all the writ petitioners have to be offered appointment; appointment from the reserve list would be made strictly in order of merit of the candidates in the reserve list and additionally keeping in view the position of reservation. Needful shall now be done by the RPSC and the State within a period of two months from today.

¶24

22. All appeals are accordingly disposed of.”

¶25

Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 23.01.2019 passed in D. B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1475/2018 filed in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16973/2017.

¶26

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶27

MANOJ NARWANI /27

The Secretary, v. Ilashree Yogi D/O Sant Nath Yogi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Secretary, v. Ilashree Yogi D/O Sant Nath Yogi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Raj and Ors. Vs Anand Sharma andORS

Suman Kumari D/O Shri Bhagirath Mal Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Suman Kumari D/O Shri Bhagirath Mal Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

The Secretary, Vs Ilashree Yogi D/O Sant Nath Yogi

Commissioner of Central Goods and Ser Tax Vs Tanwar Industries

Smt. Rekha W/O Naresh Vs Naresh S/O Shambhu Dayal