In a special leave petition regarding an arbitration, the High Court of Rajasthan held that no interference with the impugned order was called for. The court also found the maintainability suspect and noted the DRAT could consider the appellant's contention regarding pre-deposit reduction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 279/2019
M/s. Ashutosh Suitings Private Ltd.
----Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Mathur. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jagdish Chandra Vyas.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
01/07/2019
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (S. RAVINDRA BHAT),CJ
47-Ashutosh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court is called upon to interfere with the impugned order.
Whether the maintainability of the appeal is good.
M/s. Ashutosh Suitings Private Ltd.
Punjab National Bank
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
