The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed an appeal against a Single Judge's order which held that the appellant was ineligible for age relaxation as he did not meet the deadline. The Court upheld the finding.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 209/2019
Ram Chandra Pushkarna S/o Jai Kishan, Aged About 39 Years, Village- Post- Madar, Tehsil- Badgaon, District- Udaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Ritu Raj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : ---------
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
21/05/2019
(2 of 2)
[SAW-209/2019]
date, i.e. 01.01.2017, the petitioner/appellant did not fulfill the eligibility criteria.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
(S. RAVINDRA BHAT),J
14-Kshama Dixit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a subsequent amendment to rules concerning recruitment can be given retrospective effect after the initiation of the selection process.
Ram Chandra Pushkarna
State Of Rajasthan
Chairman, Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board
Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
