The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the special appeal allowing the controversy to remain sub judice based on a prior Division Bench judgment that ruled res judicata applies.
The special appeal was dismissed as the controversy was not res-integra in light of the earlier judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 2/2019
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9249/2017
----Appellants
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
Judgment
01/02/2019
Learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that the controversy involved in the present appeal is no more res-integra and squarely covered by judgment of Division Bench of this Court in State of Rajasthan & Others Vs. Smt. Manju Yadav & Others, (D.B. Special
(2 of 2)
[SAW-2/2019]
Appeal (Writ) No. 1116/2018 decided on 18.09.2018) ,
whereby aforesaid special appeal was dismissed.
In view of above, present special appeal also stands dismissed in the light of aforesaid judgment of Division Bench in State of Rajasthan & Others Vs. Smt. Manju Yadav & Others (supra) .
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J
Manoj/17
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Rajasthan & Others Vs. Smt. Manju Yadav & OthersFollowed¶25
State of Rajasthan & Others Vs. Smt. Manju Yadav & Others, (D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1116/2018 decided on 18.09.2018)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SMT. ANITA
GOVERDHAN BARDHAR
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
