Bench dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as no representative appeared on behalf of the appellant despite the court taking the matter up.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1277/2008
Smt. Uma Paliwal W/o Shri Shashi Paliwal aged about 49 years, sole Proprietor- Shruti Marble, Sole K-47, Income Tax Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur Through Sh. Sudhir Paliwal
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaivardhan Shekhawat, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R. P. Singh, Additional Advocate General
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
22/11/2019
None has appeared on behalf of the appellant.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
(SABINA),J
Gourav/Jatin /02
Smt. Uma Paliwal W/o Shri Shashi Paliwal
State Of Rajasthan
Sabina
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
