The vacation judge observed that the writ petition suffered from a lack of specific pleadings and averments. Permission was granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7719/2019
Om Prakash
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RS Rathore For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
(VACATION JUDGE) Order
07/06/2019
Upon perusal of the memo of petition, this Court finds that no specific pleadings and averments have been made in support of the grounds taken and arguments advanced.
Pursuant to such observation of this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition with specific and proper pleadings.
Permission granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition.
(DINESH MEHTA),VJ
223-CPGoyal/-
Om Prakash
State Of Rajasthan
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
