The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition and dismissed it accordingly, noting the cause of action relates to Delhi territory.
Writ application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7074/2019
R.P. Meena S/o Shri S.l. Meena, Aged About 50 Years, Presently Residing At A-21, Ashish Vihar, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Meena, present in person. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
01/07/2019
Petitioner, present in person, is allowed to withdraw the writ application to appoach the appropriate forum in view of the fact that grievance raised is with reference to cause of action and adjudication that relates to territory of Delhi.
Accordingly, writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J
Pcg/30
R.P. Meena
Union Of India
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
